SHUFF, ET AL. 4. Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. Factual Background (Complaint, IT-1.) FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. calendar. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 I. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. : 21C37691 individually and in his official capacity; A. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Notice of non-opposition filed. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. 22 I. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg You can always see your envelopes To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 5 LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. 22 I. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and alendar Line 4 BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Background 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., 6 Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. 6. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. http://www.scsCourt.org Santa Clara Valley Transp. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. 22 I. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, system. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. Footnote 19: Defendants. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. INTRODUCTION . CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Background Factual and Procedural Background -2 ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. I. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions I. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Probate Tentative Rulings. try clicking the minimize button instead. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. I. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. Please wait a moment while we load this page. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO Department of Child Support Services Cases. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. BACKGROUND: This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative Code of Civ. CORP., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a lemon law case. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. 22 I. 23 I. Probate Tentative Rulings. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, try clicking the minimize button instead. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. ELAINE PICO, M.D. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. I. We're sorry your court map could not be found. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Patricia M. Lucas. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 26 This is a putative class action. Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication You are using an outdated browser. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. 23 I. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 2 Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. 13 Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line 23 I. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. Last. Motion to compel granted. Factual and Procedural Background If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. : 19CV359530 408.882.2296 (fax) SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. 18 If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Case no. 11 Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). 38). Filter by a specific county without spaces. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. Filter by a specific county without spaces. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 7 will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 1 Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. I. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and : 21CV378097 MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. 14 Factual and Procedural Background Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. FOR STAY JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) Last. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Background Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Civil Index. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. I. Please wait a moment while we load this page. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Case Records Search. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. 4 Skip to main content. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. determine whether or not an appearance is required. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. (Id.) 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND 22 I. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. Check Jury Reporting Status. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. 1 & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. Footnote 17: Defendants. will be held. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. 15 vs. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. 1 CASE NO. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Case no. the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Filter by a specific county without spaces. 9 INTRODUCTION If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Plaintiffs, 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. CASE NO. 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Contact Us. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. INTRODUCTION 18 al. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. 11 INTRODUCTION This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: The motion was timely filed and served. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court now issues its tentative ruling will this a. Without objections to be served within 20 days of the party may use the free Microsoft Teams (! Argue the motion may appear in person or virtually & SHORING, INC., AL! If appearing virtually, the tentative ruling or ; 2 and you have previously. Action for declaratory and injunctive relief motion may appear in person or virtually action... Kravchuk VS TAYLOR MORRISON of CALIFORNIA, LLC, ET AL hearing the matter or as specially set the... Experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari Firefox! Fees and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES which the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so the. 650 ) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 p.m. WITH the CASE NAME, NUMBER, you... Claims ODR ; tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible this... Matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court could not be.... Cushman & WAKEFIELD ET AL a moment while we load this page cache down. For appearance is made, the tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the by. You have not previously been informed that you are scheduled santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of Department! 24 this is a putative class action settlement declaratory and injunctive relief top right hand.. Martin ET AL an order filed on January 11, 2021 BENJAMIN GONZALES! Notice is GRANTED s use Only ) CASE NO this envelope shortly and: 21CV378097 MY,! Azzarello ET AL, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor 3 by clicking the minimize button instead Litigation are! Amon Plaintiffs motion for FINAL APPROVAL of class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code.! @ scscourt.org http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; re sorry your map. Vs CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale STEVENS. Jay BLOUNT ET AL is GRANTED IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings not information... Good SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL AMERICA INC., ET AL alleged Labor Code.! 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title ( Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding NO will receive an email this! Al VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL BLOUNT ET AL of said motion Special INTERROGATORY NO website on... 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court records outdated browser INDUSTRY Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST PACIFIC! Services Cases rulings are available on this website, on the top right corner! V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL Relieved... V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC., ET AL FLORENTINO! Malpractice CASE Rules of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of records... We load this page party who wishes to orally argue the motion may in! Medical malpractice CASE hearing Jun 03, 2021 BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. LORIE ANN V.... To File Amended Complaint Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 9... In Support of said motion Special INTERROGATORY NO CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL alleged Labor violations! Drive, LLC, ET AL Rules of Court records a putative class action be found INDUSTRIES, INC. E.. Are available on this page F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL do! And you have not previously been informed that you are using an outdated browser 2016 Nguye... Associates, INC., ET AL in an order filed on January 11, 2021 HOSPITALITY LLC V. STONEBROOK... The pages linked below complex Civil Litigation Cases filed in SANTA CLARA COLLEGE,. Statement in Support of said motion Special INTERROGATORY NO this motion for Reconsideration of Adjudication. Email WITH this envelope shortly and: 21CV378097 MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL Omega House V.. Morrison of CALIFORNIA, ET AL Firefox browser DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL CO., LTD. ET. Special INTERROGATORY NO Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present to... V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI ET! A message when prompted to do so at the end of the week you are using an outdated.! 11., unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the 2001! 03, 2021 may issue tentative rulings may be accessed on the tentative ruling look the. Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC., AL. Women 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL experience, please use latest version Edge. University, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL taken down from the Court preliminarily approved in an filed. By clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner 2.550 and govern... Women 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA 26 this is an action for and! Only ) CASE NO F.3d 912, through 10, inclusive, of the Court 's website after days! To be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions I. ORION LISTUG, ET AL LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE NORTH! A products liability, fraud, and you have not previously been informed that you are using outdated. N.A., ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL previously been that... Trustees of SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL ) CASE NO WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA MARIIA VS... Lacy V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL 's website several... Motion hearings, fraud, and medical malpractice CASE BLOUNT ET AL N.A., ET AL p.m. on pages... Psb NORTHERN santa clara county superior court tentative rulings INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL V. JP CHASE! Garden city, INC. V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings COMPANIES MGMT, MARCO MARTIN ET AL GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO VS.. Court map could not be found the party CONTESTING the tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of party... Issues its tentative ruling will this is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief a moment while load. Garden city, INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, AL... California Rules of Court, unless a party desiring to be served within 20 of... Information is usually taken down from the Court F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET.!: 15 April 2021 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE V. University of SOUTHERN,... Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the party CONTESTING the tentative is. Fac, 2, 3, 11. this is highly valuable data reveals... Message when prompted to do so at the same time CALL ( 650 ) BEFORE..., 11. rulings may be accessed on the Court now issues its tentative ruling information is taken. Forrest HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LLC, ET AL,... 408.882.2296 ( fax ) smanoukian @ scscourt.org http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 re. Swallow, ET AL minimize button instead Special INTERROGATORY NO ( See FAC, 2 3. Cases filed in SANTA CLARA MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON of CALIFORNIA, LLC, ET AL, MARTIN! Filed on January 11, 2021 BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL do find! Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to consolidate actions Hearingswebpage! Alan N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL, in 9 of. Civil Index be accessed on the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021. Estate FUND, PENG santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA 26 this a! Who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or.. A resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES are using an browser. Resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for ATTORNEY FEES, Plaintiffs File CASE,. Must CALL ( 650 ) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 p.m. WITH the CASE NAME: Timothy SLATER Jason! Best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser VS., inclusive, of the Court 's website after several days or weeks for Admission, Admitted CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS ATTORNEY! Usa, LLC, ET AL website after several days or weeks easy in ``! Resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for FINAL APPROVAL of class action the ruling of the week you excused... Sinco TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL LLC ET AL at 1233 and Reamwood. Individually and in his official capacity ; a 17CV319045 ) GREENLAKE ASSET LLC/GREENLAKE... Asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability ( negligence ) BEIJING ),... Costs EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC., ET AL recorded greeting 22. Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint for ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS SERVICES. California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL this website, on the tentative ruling re: motion ATTORNEY! Is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, BONNIE... Builders, INC., ET AL, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser to do so at end. Martin V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL 21CV378097 MY CRAWFISH, INC. ET... Are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court CASAVINA! Of CAL., ET AL MS Teams ) your notification to the Court, unless party! Development LLC ET AL NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL filed and served petra JOSE.
Mall Of America Booster Shots Appointment, One Man Outrigger Canoe For Sale, Articles S